17 members1 Like
Started Jun 23, 2015 0 Replies 0 Likes
For those interested: 23 - 30 August 2015, The conference aims to promote scientific exchange and the development of novel ideas, with a particular emphasis on interdisciplinarity. It mainly covers…Continue
Started Jul 28, 2014 0 Replies 0 Likes
Tenzin Tethong - Is making a second appearance on The People Speak Show to discuss his current position as Director of the Tibetan…Continue
Seij has not received any gifts yet
Comment Wall (4 comments)
You need to be a member of Theosophy.Net to add comments!
O dear lady! Unfortunately, my article on Rudolf Steiner was written in Russian but I can translate it into English. I think you've accomplished the irreconcilable contradictions because I'd seen your comments on Conference on Quantum Physics. Therefore you can join theosophy and positive science in your conscience. As rule, these two area are irreconcilable. As I know Madam Blavatsky critiqued classical physics and Darwinism while positive-minded scientists interpret theosophy and anthroposophy as superstitions and myths what inapplicable as philosophical truths in modern era. My mother is a biochemist and a positive-minded scientist and she believe subtle body concept is outdated. One person rarely can be scientist and theosophist just as like they're no religious physicist and geneticist in our times (the founder of genetics was Catholic monk, Isaac Newton took an interest in heremericism, Paracelsus cured sicks using philosopher's stone but these times went by).
O dear lady! I believe you can accomplish the almost impossible because you've joined materialistic positive science (physics as it the most extreme representation) and theosophy what issue from non-empirical and supernatural divine Source. Indeed, you've accomplished a miracle and the real scientific revolution. You've been envied by Helen Blavatsky herself. Positive-minded persons and theosophists are rarely learn to understand one another. You aren't understand otherwise-minded, you joins in herself two nature: scientific and non-scientific. My mother had read my article on Rudolf Steiner's doctrine and she said she was in a nasty state and a shock because according her opinion. Rudolf Steiner's doctrine contradicts modern data biology, physics, chemistry and astronomy. Such people as my mother is, I believe, conservative scientists-orhodoxes (she is biochemist by profession and can't stand occultism). Many year ago her colleagues try to gave audiorecords with Secret Doctrine to her. Lately she would confess me the she couldn't accept heard as truth but only as obscurantism. She said me that her colleagues who had given that audiorecords were idiot
Hi and Welcome to Theosophy.Net :)
welcome! please read our FAQ and Rules of the Road