JOHN KEITH JACKSON
  • agia galini, crete
  • Greece
Share on Facebook MySpace

JOHN KEITH JACKSON's Friends

  • Deb

JOHN KEITH JACKSON's Discussions

Shankara and Buddhism

Started Aug 15, 2012 0 Replies

I hope David Reigle does not take this the wrong way but intrigued by his reference to Shankaras criticism of Buddhism in the commentaries on the Brahma Sutras I find the reasoning there less than…Continue

Alaya-Vijnana and The 'learned Tibetan'

Started Aug 11, 2012 0 Replies

Having just read David Reigles 'Confusing the Esoteric with the Exoteric: T. Subba Row on Advaita Vedånta' I find him criticizing this passage from. “Tibetan Teachings,” in H. P. Blavatsky Collected…Continue

Yogacara: meaning of avyavasthitasatya and uyavasthitasatya

Started Apr 2, 2012 0 Replies

these terms are in the Cheng Wei-Shih Lun ( Doctrine of Mere-Consciousness) ebook:…Continue

Gifts Received

Gift

JOHN KEITH JACKSON has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

JOHN KEITH JACKSON's Page

Profile Information

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Theosophy.Net to add comments!

Join Theosophy.Net

At 11:23pm on August 15, 2012, Hari Menon said…

There is no dissonance between the tenets of Sankara and Buddha , an anachronistic view of refutations of the buddhist doctrine and vedanta  (as we percieve) would lead to interminable discussions on the merits and demerits of each . It is a very simple issue that is resolved with a little wisdom - Buddhism had deteriorated to a large extent from the basic tenets of Gauthama  and all Shankara had done was to refute the more average contents of the philosophy which was not part of the more matured one but held sway due to the very fact that they were easily understood being average , but non productive. The corrupt versions of Buddhism (as not practiced by Gauthama nor advised by him ) believed the intellect to be the soul and discernible only intermittently - more akin to saying  "In deep sleep I was aware of nothing, so I was not there at that time ". 

Even the ancient Greeks would have laughed at such a fallacy , for all Shankara espoused was that in relation to the self (or oneself or to the inquiry as to who one is ) a person should look at the following 4 aspects and satisfy himself -

aspects being :

1. It is always the known.

2.It need not be known.

3. It cannot be known.

4. It can be known .

        People only discuss of Shankara vs. Buddism , but Shankara has also refuted the Materialists, the Rationalists, the Idealists and the Nihilists most people are not aware of this fact , for if one goes carefully through the original portions of his refutation one finds that Buddhism in its many aspects as practised in those times had become  so entrenched and absorbed all philosophies indiscriminately that he had to educate people that the Buddhism  that they knew had parts of  all the other philosophies inappropriately thrust into it . It was the Buddhists that he refuted not Buddhism which advocated transmission of knowledge through silence . And hence the use of the word Veda to indicate wisdom .  In passing some food for thought for the lovers of wisdom -

On waking from deep sleep a person denies the existence of the Knower, Knowing and the Known - but never Knowledge . 

At 11:30am on April 2, 2012,
Moderator
Deb
said…

Welcome to the forum!  Look around, get comfortable, and let us hear from you.  We're glad you're here!

At 6:22pm on April 1, 2012,
Moderator
John
said…

Welcome!

please feel free to browse around here and participate in discussions !!

 
 
 

Search Theosophy.Net!

Loading

What to do...

Join Theosophy.Net Blogs Forum Live Chat Invite Facebook Facebook Group

A New View of Theosophy


About
FAQ

Theosophy References


Wiki Characteristics History Spirituality Esotericism Mysticism RotR ToS

Our Friends

© 2024   Created by Theosophy Network.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service