Comment

Moderator Comment by John on April 12, 2014 at 5:49am

David:

>>  I do see what I consider to be a major difference though, Science looks at what has been created, Theosophy looks at the creating.

see comment to PuzzleSolver -- that may help clear your thinking of Myths etc.

Moderator Comment by John on April 12, 2014 at 5:45am

objects are like tables you can kick. They are ontological objects.

QM deals with that which may become, or possibly known, epistemologically/subjective scenarios (contradictory items even) and also that which is real/ontological. Subjective may be considered epistemological in this sense.

that help or confuse?

Comment by PuzzleSolver on April 12, 2014 at 4:45am

What does that mean? subjective particles (virtual)...

Moderator Comment by John on April 3, 2014 at 2:20am

Science is knee deep in "particle" creation/annihilation, and the reverse process. Also subjective "particles (virtual, potential etc.).

Comment by David Allen on April 2, 2014 at 10:55pm

True enough. I do see what I consider to be a major difference though, Science looks at what has been created, Theosophy looks at the creating.